Legal Opinion

City of Austin v. Salazar

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 23, 1951No. 9958PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHER, Chief Justice.

Angela Salazar and her two minor daughters, the widow and only children of the deceased, Miguel Salazar, and Juanita Salazar, the only surviving parent of the deceased, sued under the death statute for damages resulting from the death of Miguel Salazar and for the benefit of their sub-rogee, Security Mutual Casualty Company, a corporation, for the Workmen Compensation Benefits paid by said insurance company. The plaintiffs were in agreement as to their respective rights, and they were represented by the same counsel and no controversy existed between them.

The plaintiffs…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BehneTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Seinsheimer v. BurkhartTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Turner v. Texas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. East Texas Motor Freight Lines v. LoftisTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Myers v. CrenshawTexas Supreme Court · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Truelove v. TrueloveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Luvual v. Henke & Pillot, Division of the Kroger Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Goff v. Lubbock Bldg. ProductsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API