Merced Oil Mining Co. v. Patterson
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. George E. Church, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal by defendants, upon the judgment-roll, from a judgment in favor of plaintiff C. H. Castle against the defendants, adjudging him to be the owner and entitled to the possession of forty acres of mineral land (the mineral being oil), being the south half of the north half of the southeast quarter of section 22, township 19 S., range 15 E., M. D. B. & M. The ease was before us on a former appeal involving a judgment against defendants in favor of Castle for said land and also in favor of the Merced Oil Mining Company for the north half of the south half of said southeast quarter…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chrisman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Pool v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Miller v. ChrismanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- McLemore v. Express Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Merced Oil Mining Co. v. PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smith v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1913
- United States v. HurstDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1924
- Adams v. BenedictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Hartman Gold Mining Co. v. WarningArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Jose v. UtleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.