Hartman Gold Mining Co. v. Warning
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
Frank Warning, Cyril Wig-more and C. O. Sanford, hereinafter called plaintiffs, brought suit against Hartman Gold Mining Company, a corporation, hereinafter called defendant, to quiet title to the Big Jim Extension Mining Claim in Mohave county. Defendant filed various motions and demurrers, answered, and then cross-complained, asking to quiet its title to the North Aztec mining-claim, covering the identical ground claimed as the Big Jim Extension in plaintiffs’ complaint.
The case was tried before the court without a jury, and judgment rendered in favor of plaintiffs, and, after the usual…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Chambers v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Lakin v. Sierra Buttes Gold Min. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1885
- Emerson v. McWhirterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Madison v. Octave Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. BleakArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Lane v. HognasonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Swansea Properties, Inc. v. HedrickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Sakow v. J. E. Riley Inv. Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1939
- Frazier v. Consolidated Tungsten Mines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.