Legal Opinion
Jose v. Utley
California Supreme Court
Decided May 13, 1921No. L. A. No. 6355PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs to enjoin the defendant from prosecuting Margaret Truax for violating the corporate securities law (Stats. 1917, p. 673; Stats. 1919, p. 231), popularly known as the “Blue Sky Law.” Margaret Truax is engaged in selling one million shares of corporate stock in the Imperial Pacific Oil, Gas and Refining Company, a corporation. Plaintiffs claim that the Corporate Securities Act is unconstitutional for various reasons and that the threatened action of the district attorney should be restrained. A demurrer was interposed to the complaint, was sustained,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chrisman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Pool v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Miller v. ChrismanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Vermont Marble Co. v. Declez Granite Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gregory v. HeckeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Davis v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Richman v. Bank of PerrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Davis v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Hood v. SternCalifornia Superior Court · 1924