Paragon Engineering, Inc. v. Rhodes
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The question before the Court on this appeal is whether the unchallenged testimony of several witnesses, who were not professional surveyors, was sufficient for the jury to conclude that defendant engineering and survey firm was negligent in staking a survey site. Even though the law ordinarily requires expert testimony to establish the standard of care a professional person should use, we conclude that the testimony was sufficient under the facts of this case, and we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Defendant Paragon Engineering, Inc. (Paragon), a civil engineering and survey firm,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parrish v. SpinkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Kundahl v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Looker v. Gulf Coast FairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- RL Reid, Inc. v. PlantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Jarrard v. SeifertCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bell v. JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Revis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Vaughan v. OliverSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Associated Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. Fleming Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Mobile Infirmary Ass'n v. TylerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.