Legal Opinion

Larsen v. Daynes

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1943No. 6395PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Jusice.

This cause was decided and reported in 102 Utah ..., 122 P. 2d 429. Upon petition for rehearing the court was persuaded the matter should be re-examined. Accordingly, the cause was reargued and briefs submitted. The only question presented by the appeal is whether the complaint states a cause of action. The trial court sustained a general demurrer and dismissed the action upon the ground the complaint did not state facts sufficient to entitle plaintiff to any relief. We limit this discussion to the question: Does the complaint state a cause of action?

As is often the case, we…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Larsen v. DaynesUtah Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Utah Ass'n of Credit Men v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hyrup v. HyrupUtah Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clarke E. Davenport v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association and Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. West Coast Poultry Co. v. GlasnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Funk v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API