Legal Opinion
Larsen v. Daynes
Utah Supreme Court
Decided February 20, 1942No. 6395PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARSON, Justice.
The only question presented on this appeal involves the action of the court in sustaining a general demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint. The complaint indicates the following factual situation:
That after plaintiff acquired the property involved in this action he intermarried with defendant; that in February, 1940, plaintiff was awarded a decree of divorce from defendant, which decree became final August 27, 1940; that the decree of divorce provided:
“And it is also further ordered, adjudged and decreed, that plaintiff he, and he is hereby awarded immediate and exclusive…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rees v. City of WatertownSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Heine v. Levee CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- In re Interborough Consol. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Manufacturers' Finance Co. v. McKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Earp v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Larsen v. DaynesUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Funk v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 1979