Legal Opinion

Hyrup v. Hyrup

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1927No. 4527PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCherry, J.

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover separate maintenance from her husband, Andrew S. Hyrup. Certain other persons to whom the husband had sold or contracted to sell tracts of real property were joined as defendants, but demurrers interposed by them to the plaintiff’s complaint were sustained. The defendant, Andrew S. Hyrup, answered plaintiff’s complaint by denying its material allegations, and by way of counterclaim sought a decree of divorce from the plaintiff upon the grounds of desertion. The plaintiff, by her reply, put in issue the allegations of desertion, and upon the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  2. Hyrup v. HyrupUtah Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Larsen v. DaynesUtah Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API