Legal Opinion

United States v. Little

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 2004No. 03-CO-452PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Associate Judge:

In this government appeal from the grant of post-conviction relief, see D.C.Code § 28-110 (2001), two questions are presented. First, was appellee (hereafter Little) in custody for purposes of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), when in response to police interrogation he gave a written statement implicating himself in the murder of Donnell Perry? Second, if so, did his trial attorney render ineffective assistance of counsel by not filing a pretrial motion to suppress the statement, which the government acknowledges was made without…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cosio v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Long v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Morales v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Griffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API