Cosio v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
This appeal concerns a criminal defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel. Appellant Richard Cosío asserts that he was convicted of multiple felony counts of child sexual abuse because his trial counsel failed to discover readily available evidence that would have impeached his accuser. A divided three-judge panel of this Court rejected appellant’s claim. We went en banc not only to reconsider the panel’s decision, but also to clarify the legal principles governing ineffectiveness claims based on counsel’s alleged investigative…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Rompilla v. BeardSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- CHARLES S. TURNER,CHRISTOPHER D. TURNER,RUSSELL L. OVERTON, LEVY ROUSE, CLIFTON E. YARBOROUGH, KELVIN D. SMITH, & TIMOTHY CATLETTDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Otts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Perez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- KEVIN M. BELLINGER v. UNITED STATES.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Kigozi v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.