Legal Opinion

Jones v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 2007No. 04-CO-1171PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Senior Judge:

Appellant Michael Jones was convicted in a jury trial of a number of charges relating to two rapes which occurred in the same Washington, D.C. neighborhood in the Spring of 1985. More than fifteen years later, a motions judge denied, without a hearing, the latest in a series of motions filed by appellant in which he alleged, pursuant to D.C.Code § 23-110 (2001), that his trial counsel’s failure to interview and call at trial two critical alibi witnesses constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. Appellant argues that the motions judge erred in denying a hearing on…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. Hansford P. Miller v. Jackson AviromCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hardy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Strozier v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Brian Lamont Copeland v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Patterson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Steward v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API