Curtis G. and Stacy S. Marks v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LILLEHAUG, Justice.
In 200,7, respondents Curtis and. Stacy Marks filed Minnesota tax returns, claiming they were part-year residents of the state. Following an audit, the Commissioner of Revenue (the Commissioner) determined that the Markses were full-year residents and assessed additional income tax, penalties, and interest. The Markses appealed, arguing that the Commissioner improperly applied the definition of “resident” in Minn.Stat. § 290.01, subd. 7(b) (2014). The tax court granted summary judgment to the Markses. .Because we conclude that the tax court’s interpretation of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Maguire v. TrefrySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of DakotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Andrea L. Dammann v. Progressive Direct InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Gen. Mills, Inc. v. Comm'r RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- City of Oronoco v. Fitzpatrick Real Estate, LLC v. Whitney National Bank of New Orleans, LouisianaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- STRIB IV, LLC fka Richard T. Burke I, LLC, Relator v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Toyota-Lift of Minnesota, Inc. v. American Warehouse Systems, LLC v. Les NielsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.