Toyota-Lift of Minnesota, Inc. v. American Warehouse Systems, LLC v. Les Nielsen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Justice.
We are presented here with a claim that commissions earned under an employment agreement áre governed by statutory penalty provisions and those penalties may not be offset against other damages. , Stated otherwise: May an “offsetting liability” owed to the employer be considered when determining whether an employee “recovers” a greater sum of wages than the employer tendered in good faith, for the purpose of deciding whether a penalty may be imposed on the employer under Minn.Stat. § 181.14 (2014)? The court of appeals held that no offset was permissible. We affirm the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Balder v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Rohmiller v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. GrecingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. TempWorks Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Douglas Galipeau v. Briana Bixby and Mei-Lani BixbyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Auge v. Fairchild Equip., Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Auge v. Fairchild Equipment, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.