Legal Opinion
Grenier v. Grenier
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 4, 1952PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The plaintiff, a claimant under the workmen’s compensation law, was denied compensation on the ground that his work for a contractor on a building was not “a part or process in the trade or business” of the owner under § 7423 of the General Statutes. He has appealed on the principal ground that the finding does not support this conclusion.
The finding, which is not subject to correction, may be summarized as follows: Barreuther Brothers, Inc., hereinafter called the defendant, owns and runs an automobile sales and repair business in Winsted. It uses two buildings and the first floor of a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bogoratt v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- King v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Bello v. NotkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Crisanti v. Cremo Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Bown v. Waterbury Battery Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Alpha Crane Service, Inc. v. Capitol Crane Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Gigliotti v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Battistelli v. Connohio, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Mancini v. Bureau of Public WorksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.