Legal Opinion
Crisanti v. Cremo Brewing Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 7, 1950PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
In this action, sounding in negligence, the trial court found that negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries but denied recovery because it concluded that the relationship of principal employer and employee under the Workmen’s Compensation Act existed between the defendant and the plaintiff. Whether that conclusion was justified is the question raised by this appeal.
The plaintiff was an employee of Federal Motor Lines, a corporation engaged in the general transportation business for hire. The defendant at its plant in New Britain manufactured, a malt…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Palumbo v. George A. Fuller Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Bogoratt v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Fox v. Fafnir Bearing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Massolini v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Hoard v. Sears Roebuck Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Jett v. DunlapSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Sharp v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Alpha Crane Service, Inc. v. Capitol Crane Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Gigliotti v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.