Legal Opinion
Meilink v. Unemployment Reserves Comm'n of Cal.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 5, 1942No. 61PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson
The petitioner is the trustee of a bankrupt which was indebted to the California Unemployment Reserves Commission for contributions which had accrued under the California Unemployment Reserves Act. Section 45 of that Act provided that, in the event of default in payment of contributions due, the employer “shall become additionally liable for interest on such payments at the rate of twelve per cent per annum from the date such payment becomes due, both principal and interest being payable in the same manner as the contributions.” Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, Act 8780d, § 45. The Commission filed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. ChildsSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- New York v. JersawitSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- In Re Pressed Steel Car Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- In re Ajax Dress Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Unemployment Reserves Commission v. MeilinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Gardner v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- City of New York v. SaperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- HomeStreet, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUEWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- HomeStreet, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2009
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.