Legal Opinion

In re Ajax Dress Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 9, 1923No. 234PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The question whether that which the state calls a tax is a tax, and a proper tax, produces a federal question, under the Bankruptcy Act. New Jersey v. Anderson, 203 U. S. 483, 27 Sup. Ct. 137, 51 L. Ed. 284. Yet, under familiar rulings, the construction of a state statute and the definition of its terms are matters on which we should ordinarily follow the authority of the highest state court. Therefore we regard the first branch of this case as raising only the question whether it is or is not governed by People ex rel. Mutual Trust Co. v. Miller, 177 N. Y.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New Jersey v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. People Ex Rel. Mutual Trust Co. v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. New York Terminal Co. v. GausNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. In re J. Menist & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  5. The People v. . Spring Val. Hydraulic Gold Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. New York v. JersawitSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Meilink v. Unemployment Reserves Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Horn v. Boone County, Neb.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. In Re L. Gandolfi & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  5. In re A. E. Fountain, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API