Legal Opinion

Barton v. Montex Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 27, 1927No. 7090PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLENDON, C. j.

This was a direct proceeding in equity to set aside a default judgment in garnishment, brought after expiration of the term at which the garnishment judgment was rendered. Since we ha've-reached the conclusion that the appeal must be dismissed because the judgment appealed from was not final, only a brief outline of the-proceedings, all of which yyere in the district court of Burnet county, will be necessary.

In January, 1922, Barton recovered a judgment against one Terpening for $12,191.30,. bearing 10 per cent, interest per annum from date. On June 11, 1925, Barton made…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Treadway v. EastburnTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. President of the Bank of the United States v. MossSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  3. Overton v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Fowler v. SimpsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Martin v. Burns, Walker Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Humprey v. HarrellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  2. Switzer v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. Cloughly v. NBC Bank-Seguin, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
  4. Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  5. Dews v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API