Legal Opinion

Ronaldson v. National Association of Home Builders

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 18, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-1034Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHRISTINA RONALDSON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-1034 (CKK) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS, Defendant. Memorandum Opinion (November 18, 2020) In her Amended Complaint, Ms. Christina Ronaldson (“Plaintiff”) asserts claims against her former employer, National Association of Home Builders (“NAHB” or “Defendant”), under the District of Columbia Wage Payment and Collection Law, D.C. Code §§ 32–1301 et seq., (“DCWPCL”), and the common law doctrine of unjust enrichment. As discussed herein, Ms. Ronaldson’s claims focus on the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API