Legal Opinion

State v. Hansen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1996No. S-95-312PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the criminal prosecution of a motorist for driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DUI) after the motorist’s driver’s license has been administratively revoked violates the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy.

Russell J. Hansen appeals from an order of the district court for Dodge County affirming the county court’s overruling of Hansen’s plea in bar to criminal DUI charges. The court found that the Double Jeopardy Clauses of the U.S. and Nebraska Constitutions are not applicable because the administrative revocation…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. GustafsonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. McClendonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Betterman v. Dept. of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. BowersNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Deutschendorf v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API