Legal Opinion

Raymond J. Kline v. Johns-Manville, and Pittsburg-Corning Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 23, 1984No. 18-56361PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

This case presents the question whether California’s rule imposing liability on a successor corporation for its predecessor’s defective products applies when the successor purchases not the entire assets of the predecessor, but only one part of the predecessor’s business. The district court refused to apply successor liability in cases of partial acquisition. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

From 1936 until 1962, Unarco manufactured an asbestos pipe insulation product called “Unibestos.” Unibestos was only one of hundreds of products manufactured by Unarco. In 1962, Unarco sold its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Rawlings v. D. M. Oliver, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Komatsu Ltd. v. States Steamship Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Schwartz v. McGraw-Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsman Local Union No. 20 v. Martin Jaska, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. World Famous Drinking Emporium, Inc. v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. International Union Of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsman Local Union No. 20, Afl-Cio v. Martin Jaska, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Columbia Propane, L.P. v. Wisconsin Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  5. The Vollrath Company v. Sammi Corporation Ken Carter Industries, Inc. Sammisa (America) Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API