Legal Opinion

Fisher v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1963No. 36317PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

This is an action brought by the appellant (plaintiff), Kenneth J. Fisher, to recover for injuries received due to the alleged negligence of the defendant (respondent), Standard Oil Company of California, Western Operations, Inc., and the city of Seattle.

The sole question on this appeal is whether the plaintiff is barred from recovery under RCW Title 51, the Workmen’s Compensation Act. RCW 51.24.010 permits the bringing of an action, provided the workman has been employed in extrahazardous work, “If the injury to a workman is due to negligence or wrong of another not in the same employ ...”

Res…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Greenleaf v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1961
  2. St. Claire v. Minnesota Harbor Service, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1962
  3. Murray v. . Union Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Barney v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Crawford v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Novenson v. Spokane Culvert & Fabricating Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hollingbery v. DunnWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Davis v. Early Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Bambrough v. BethersUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Manor v. Nestle Food Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API