Schreck v. Schreck
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPette, J.
In an action to set aside as nnll and void a separation agreement dated February 27, 1953, and to direct the defendant to return the real and personal property transferred to her by the plaintiff pursuant to such agreement, the defend*706ant moves to dismiss each of the two causes of action alleged in the complaint on the grounds (1) that neither states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4) and (2) that the decree annexed to the complaint constitutes an existing final judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of New York rendered on the merits,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eleanor Holm v. Morris Shilensky, Arthur Cantor and Charles Wohlstetter, as Executors of the Estate of Billy Rose, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Leventhal v. MichaelisNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Hines v. HinesNew York Supreme Court · 1957