Legal Opinion
Eleanor Holm v. Morris Shilensky, Arthur Cantor and Charles Wohlstetter, as Executors of the Estate of Billy Rose, Deceased
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 5, 1968No. 121, Docket 31546PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATERMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant brought her action for money damages in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the appellees, the executors of the Estate of Billy Rose, alleging, in five causes of action, that prior to the execution of a separation agreement entered into between appellant and Rose, Rose, her then husband, fraudulently misrepresented to her that two paintings received and accepted by her as part of a property settlement between them were genuine Renoir paintings worth approximately one million dollars and by this means had induced her…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Mitchell v. National Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- J. Richard Dirose v. Pk Management Corp., Nicholas A. Demare, Frank Ciccarelli, John S. Russo, Harry Kursh, Anthony Curatolo and Jerome DanskerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Spindel v. SpindelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.