Legal Opinion
Hines v. Hines
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1957PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrederick Backer, J.
Defendants move to dismiss the amended complaint for insufficiency, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The factual situation is indeed interesting, if not novel.
Plaintiff is the husband of the defendant Agnes. It is alleged that the defendant Looney is living in meretricious relationship with Agnes; that their alleged marriage is void, as is the decree of divorce obtained by Agnes from plaintiff in Alabama; and that a child (the defendant designated as “Baby Jean”) was born to said defendants Agnes and Looney.
The action is framed for a declaratory judgment and alleges two…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Baumann v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Lowe v. LoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Carruthers v. Jack Waite Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Baumann v. BaumannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Melis v. Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- A----. B v. C----. DIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- In Re L.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Henry v. RoddNew York City Family Court · 1978
- Lucey v. TorrenceNew York City Family Court · 1970
- Anonymous v. AnonymousNew York Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.