Legal Opinion

Hycel, Inc. v. Wittstruck

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided February 28, 1985No. 10-83-157-CVPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS, Justice.

This is a Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) case. 1 Dr. Wittstruck, Dr. Krohn and Dr. Walter, three physicians who operated the Waco Clinical Pathology Laboratory (Laboratory) as a partnership, recovered a joint and several judgment in excess of $4.7 million against Hycel, Inc. (Hycel) and Boehringer Mannheim Diagnostics, Inc. (BMD). (Judgment was entered against BMD as Hycel’s corporate successor.) The jury found that Hycel had violated several provisions of the DTPA when it sold an automated blood chemistry analyzer to the Laboratory in 1976, and that the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. C. & R. TRANSPORT, INC. v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Southwest Battery Corp. v. OwenTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. White v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Smith v. BaldwinTexas Supreme Court · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. FDP Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. First Title Co. of Waco v. GarrettTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Checker Bag Co. v. Washington, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  5. Howell Crude Oil Co. v. Donna Refinery Partners, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API