Legal Opinion

Smith v. Baldwin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1980No. B-8920PublishedCited by 253 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*613STEAKLEY, Justice.

On September 9, 1976, Alan Baldwin, d/b/a Alan Baldwin, Builder, contracted to build a house for Roland Smith. On the same day, Smith executed to Baldwin a promissory note for $31,300, payable within 180 days, Baldwin agreeing to pay all interim interest. Baldwin assigned the note to Mutual Savings Institution (Mutual) in order to obtain interim financing. The permanent financing was to be supplied by the Veteran’s Administration (V.A.) which required a final V.A. inspection report prior to approval of the permanent loan. Smith began moving into the house prior to the date…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Riverside National Bank v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pennington v. SingletonTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Woods v. LittletonTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight LinesTexas Supreme Court · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by253 opinions

  1. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Laidlaw Waste Systems (Dallas), Inc. v. City of WilmerTexas Supreme Court · 1995

248 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API