Legal Opinion

Home Insurance v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 9, 2000No. 95-724CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This action is brought by a performance bond surety against the United States acting through NASA, as owner of a construction project at Cape Kennedy. Pending are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. In broad terms, the question presented is what plaintiffs rights are, as surety, to the contract balance. Oral argument was held, and additional submissions solicited. The matter is now fully briefed.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

NASA entered into a contract with International Steel Industries, Inc. (ISI) for the construction of a piping system at its vehicle assembly…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. G. L. Christian and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Memphis & Little Rock Railroad v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hamilton Securities Advisory Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Preferred National Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. United Surety & Indemnity Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. Wagner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Hamilton Securities Advisory Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API