Legal Opinion
Hamilton Securities Advisory Services, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 24, 2004No. 98-169CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRADEN, Judge.
This case concerns two multi-million dollar contracts for financial advisory services that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) attempted to amend in total disregard of the standard boilerplate requirements of the integration clause applicable to all federal contracts and the task order process. Accordingly, the court is compelled to begin its analysis by reminding HUD that: “The common law principle that a contract cannot be enforced if the terms are indefinite ... retains a core of vitality.” Goldstick v. ICM Realty, 788 F.2d 456, 461 (7th…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- CW Government Travel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- United States ex rel. Ervin & Associates, Inc. v. Hamilton Securities Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Hamilton Securities Advisory Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Hamilton Securities Advisory Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Lw Construction of Charleston, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.