Legal Opinion

Riley v. Janco Central, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 24, 1995No. 94-P-500PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court affirming the decision of the defendant, the zoning board of appeals of Stoughton, granting a special permit and variances to the defendant, Janco Central, Inc. (Janco). In her appeal from the grant of the special permit, the plaintiff claims that the judge committed error when he concluded, after trial, that Janco was not required to comply with a green belt requirement of the Stoughton zoning by-law and that another judge erred in allowing Janco’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing her complaint respecting the grant of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Barvenik v. Board of Aldermen of NewtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. Harvard Square Defense Fund, Inc. v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  4. Cohen v. Zoning Board of Appeals of PlymouthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  5. Redstone v. Board of Appeals of ChelmsfordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marashlian v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Butler v. City of WalthamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  3. Denneny v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  4. Rattner v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  5. Standerwick v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API