Legal Opinion
Denneny v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided September 8, 2003No. 01-P-793PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.
The defendant Célico Partnership (Célico), a consortium of providers of radio telephone communication services (most frequently in the form of cellular telephone service), applied for and received from the defendant zoning board of appeals of Seekonk (board) a special permit to construct on property owned by the defendant water district of Seekonk (water district) a 135-foot steel communications tower with attached antenna equipment and a one-story equipment building. The board also granted Célico variances that reduced certain rear and side yard setback requirements. The plaintiff appealed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marashlian v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Barvenik v. Board of Aldermen of NewtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Watros v. Greater Lynn Mental Health & Retardation Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Harvard Square Defense Fund, Inc. v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Standerwick v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Kenner v. Zoning Board of Appeals of ChathamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Butler v. City of WalthamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Sheehan v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Boothroyd v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.