Marashlian v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, C.J.
The defendants Newburyport Redevelopment Authority (Authority) and Foster Properties, Ltd. (Foster), sought and received a special permit and two zoning variances from the zoning board of appeals of Newburyport (board), so as to construct a hotel in Newburyport’s down*720town waterfront area. The plaintiff abutters appealed from the board’s decision under G. L. c. 40A, § 17 (1994 ed.),3 to the Superior Court. After a contested evidentiary hearing, a Superior Court judge found that the abutters had standing to contest the board’s action, but that the board did not exceed its authority in granting…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Building Inspector of Lancaster v. SandersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. BlakelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Barvenik v. Board of Aldermen of NewtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- Goldberg v. Board of HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Standerwick v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Roberts v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Bell v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- 81 Spooner Road, LLC v. Zoning Board of Appeals of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.