Legal Opinion

Marashlian v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 22, 1996PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, C.J.

The defendants Newburyport Redevelopment Authority (Authority) and Foster Properties, Ltd. (Foster), sought and received a special permit and two zoning variances from the zoning board of appeals of Newburyport (board), so as to construct a hotel in Newburyport’s down*720town waterfront area. The plaintiff abutters appealed from the board’s decision under G. L. c. 40A, § 17 (1994 ed.),3 to the Superior Court. After a contested evidentiary hearing, a Superior Court judge found that the abutters had standing to contest the board’s action, but that the board did not exceed its authority in granting…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. Building Inspector of Lancaster v. SandersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Royal Indemnity Co. v. BlakelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Barvenik v. Board of Aldermen of NewtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. Board of HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. Standerwick v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Roberts v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Bell v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. 81 Spooner Road, LLC v. Zoning Board of Appeals of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API