Legal Opinion

Harvard Square Defense Fund, Inc. v. Planning Board

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 22, 1989No. 88-P-1000PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, C.J.

A Superior Court judge allowed the defendants’ well-supported motion for summary judgment under Mass.R.Civ.P. 56, 365 Mass. 824 (1974), concluding that the plaintiffs lacked standing under G. L. c. 40A, § 17, as amended through St. 1987, c. 498, § 4, to challenge the Cambridge planning board’s grant of special permits for the construction of two office-retail buildings in the Harvard Square area of Cambridge. 3 We agree with the judge that none of the plaintiffs has the required standing as a person aggrieved or otherwise as a municipal officer. Consequently, we affirm the judgment.

Section 17…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. City of Lawrence v. FalzaranoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Save the Bay, Inc. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Doe v. the GovernorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Marashlian v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Barvenik v. Board of Aldermen of NewtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. Standerwick v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. Bell v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Kenner v. Zoning Board of Appeals of ChathamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API