Legal Opinion

Fong Lin v. Probert

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1920No. Civ. No. 3605PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

KEBBIGAN, J

Plaintiffs, suing as special administrators of the estate of Pong Ben Yuen, deceased, brought this action, alleging negligence on the part of defendant in the operation of an automobile owned by him resulting in injuries causing Yuen's death.

The complaint charged that deceased, at the time of the accident, was married and that he left surviving him a wife and two minor children, who are his heirs at law and in whose behalf this action is brought. Damages are hereby sought under the provisions of section 377 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

-The case was tried before the court without…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lucy v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Taylor v. Albion Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. McComish v. KaufmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brenning v. RemingtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Kerner v. Peacock Dairies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Bowker v. Illinois Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Ewens v. NewmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Favali v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API