Legal Opinion

Favali v. Richardson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1930No. Docket No. 4014PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

This is an action for damages. A judgment of nonsuit was entered in favor of the defendants and the plaintiffs have appealed. It is not contended that the judgment is erroneous except as to the defendants Richardson and Lewis, who will be referred to herein as defendants and respondents.

Respondents contend that the judgment was properly entered on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Insufficiency of a complaint is not a ground for granting a nonsuit. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 581; Pacific Finance Corp. v. Roffalli, 98 Cal. App. 198 [276…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scott v. SciaroniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Lucy v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Menefee v. Raisch Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Loop Building Co. v. DecooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Fong Lin v. ProbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ashbrook v. O'HarraAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API