Legal Opinion
Turner v. Hickman
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 30, 2004No. CIVS-99-1869 FCDKJMPPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAMRELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 686(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.
On August 4, 2004, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Defendants have filed objections to the findings and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Inouye v. KemnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Schnitzler v. ReischDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2007
- Inouye v. KemnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Inouye v. KemnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Inouye v. KemnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007