Legal Opinion
Schnitzler v. Reisch
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided September 28, 2007No. CIV. 06-4064PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge.
All Defendants have moved for summary judgment. Plaintiff resists the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, and in his “Motion to Dismiss” (Doc. 44) requests injunctive relief exempting him from the South Dakota Department of Corrections STOP program.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Aaron Schnitzler, is an inmate at the Mike Durfee State Penitentiary in Springfield, South Dakota. He filed this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 1 , alleging he has refused to participate in the South Dakota Department of Corrections STOP (sex offenders)…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Schnitzler v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Abdulrazzak v. SmithDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2017
- Abdulrazzak v. SmithDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2017