Legal Opinion

Inouye v. Kemna

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 3, 2007No. 06-15474PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

504 F.3d 705 (2007)

Ricky K. INOUYE, Plaintiff, and

Zenn K. Inouye, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ricky Kenichi Inouye, aka Ricky K. Inouye, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Michael KEMNA; Lucianne Khalaf; Daniel H. Shimizu; Peter B. Carlisle; City and County Of Honolulu; Mark Nanamori, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-15474.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 5, 2007.

Filed September 7, 2007.

Amended October 3, 2007.

Walter R. Schoettle, Walter R. Schoettle, a Law Corporation, Honolulu, HI, for plaintiff Ricky K. Inouye and Plaintiff-Appellant Zenn K.…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. (PC) Allen v. BotkinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  2. (PC) Rico v. DucartDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. (PC) Wahl v. SuttonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API