Legal Opinion

Jarvis v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 16, 1999No. 97-806TPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

On March 31, 1999, the court granted the government’s motion for summary judgment as to the second and third causes of action. Pending is plaintiffs motion for rehearing or reconsideration with respect to dismissal of the third cause of action, in which the plaintiff seeks recovery of costs incurred in defending himself in civil litigation with Charles Moncrief, litigation he alleges was spawned by the I.R.S.’s improper disclosure of plaintiffs identity as a confidential informant. This disclosure is asserted to be a breach of the agency’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Kania v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Hercules Incorporated v. The United States, Wm. T. Thompson Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  5. Terteling v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edelmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. Jarvis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. New York and Presbyterian Hospital v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  5. Tpmc-Energysolutions Environmental Services 2008, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API