T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KEENAN wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge AGEE joined. Judge AGEE wrote a separate concurring opinion.
Judge DAVIS wrote a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OPINION
BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we consider certain “prohibition” and “discrimination” challenges brought by a wireless telecommunications provider against a local governing body under a provision of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the Act). 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)®. We review the district court’s holding that the Board of Supervisors of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. WillothCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Apt Pittsburgh Limited Partnership v. Penn Township Butler County Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- At & T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City Council of Virginia BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- 360° Communications Co. v. Board of Supervisors of Albemarle CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Metropcs, Inc. v. The City And County Of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Kamaal MalloryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Loudoun County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Fairfax County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Loudoun County Board of SupervisorsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- Cellco Partnership v. Board of SupervisorsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.