New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge AGEE wrote the opinion, in which Judge DAVIS and Judge FLOYD joined. Judge DAVIS wrote a separate concurring opinion.
OPINION
AGEE, Circuit Judge:
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“the Act”) requires that a local government’s denial of a request to place “personal wireless service facilities” be supported by substantial evidence, and not “have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services.” 47 U.S.C. §§ 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II) & 332(c)(7)(B)(iii). In this case, the Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County, Virginia (“the Board”) rejected…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Town of Amherst v. Omnipoint Communications Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- 360° Communications Co. v. Board of Supervisors of Albemarle CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Petersburg Cellular Partnership, D/B/A 360o Communications Company, United States of America, Intervenor v. Board of Supervisors of Nottoway CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- South Carolina Green Party v. South Carolina State Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Fairfax County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
3Cited by7 opinions
- T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC v. City of Newport NewsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Loudoun County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Loudoun County Board of SupervisorsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- Cellco Partnership v. Board of SupervisorsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Fairfax County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.