Legal Opinion

State of California v. Levi Strauss & Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1986No. S.F. 24699PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

This court granted a hearing in this case primarily to consider the appropriate methods for distributing damages in consumer class actions. That issue arose as an aspect of intervener’s appeal from the superior court’s approval of a class action settlement. As will appear below, it is now clear that as a result of the passage of time and changes in the position of intervener no practical purpose would be served by invalidating the settlement of this six-year-old class action.

However, a sizable residue has developed in the intervening period, consisting of damages due to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Elsie Simer v. Richard J. Rios, Acting Director of Community Services Administration Community Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. Exxon Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Six (6) Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus Growers Bodine Produce Company, Inc. Robert Fletcher, D/B/A Fletcher FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Theodore H. Frank v. Netflix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Day v. AT & T CORP.California Court of Appeal · 1998

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API