People v. Guinn
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DABNEY, Acting P. J.
Defendants and appellants Ana Al-Rad Levi Guinn and Jamal Hussein Johnson appeal their convictions of murder (Pen. Code, § 187) and robbery (Pen. Code, § 211). Defendant Guinn was also charged with a special circumstance allegation that the murder was committed during the commission of a robbery. The special circumstance was found true. (Pen. Code, § 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(i).) An enhancement allegation that each defendant had personally used a deadly weapon (baseball bat) in the commission of the offense was found true as to defendant Guinn, but not true as to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- People v. GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. OrtizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. EmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- In re KirchnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. ThongvilayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.