Legal Opinion

In re Kirchner

California Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2017No. S233508PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCantil-Sakauye, C.J.

*1042 In Miller v. Alabama (2012) 567 U.S. 460 , 132 S.Ct. 2455 , 183 L.Ed.2d 407 ( Miller ), the United States Supreme Court ruled that under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution "a state may authorize its courts to impose [a sentence of] life without parole on a juvenile homicide offender [only] when the penalty is discretionary and when the sentencing court's discretion is properly exercised...." ( People v. Gutierrez (2014) 58 Cal.4th 1354 , 1379, 171 Cal.Rptr.3d 421 , 324 P.3d 245 ( Gutierrez ).) The proper exercise of discretion in this context requires the sentencing court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. FrahsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  2. In re CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. People v. PadillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
  4. In re Palmer, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. In re Palmer, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API