People v. Jameison
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.
An examination of the record in this case discloses that a fair question of fact existed, which was settled by the verdict of the jury. The record does not disclose any legal error which requires a reversal or discussion. We would be content to affirm the judgment of conviction, as the law requires us to do in the absence of legal error where the defendant has had a fair trial, without an opinion, were it not for a question of practice, which does not affect the defendant, but is of importance to the taxpayers of the State.
A great abuse has grown up in printing records on appeal in criminal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. DoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- People v. . PrioriNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Derby v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Moran v. Rainbow Appliance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Martin v. DonnellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- Koslow v. MorrisonNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of MeltzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- People v. DarlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- People v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959