Legal Opinion

Moran v. Rainbow Appliance Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrouch, J.

The actions are by the wife to recover damages for personal injuries, and by the husband for loss of services.

Plaintiff wife was employed by the Niagara Electric Service Corporation of Niagara Falls to demonstrate a mangle manufactured and sold to the Niagara Company by the defendant. The injury was sustained while operating the mangle. Recovery is sought solely on account of alleged negligent design of the mangle, there being no claim of negligence in construction or in materials used. The actions were tried together and resulted in a verdict of no cause of action in each case. Thereupon a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Middleton v. . WhitridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Chesebrough v. . ConoverNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Carlisle v. . NorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Barber Asphalt Paying Co. v. Standard Asphalt & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Howland v. . WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ridenour v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. In re the Estate of BradyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  3. People v. JameisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Price v. MullenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. Solomon v. Jacfin Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API