Legal Opinion

Martin v. Donnelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants appealed to this court from a judgment of the Rensselaer County Court, entered on a verdict in plaintiff’s favor. They prepared and served a proposed case. The plaintiff proposed amendments which included the insertion of voluminous objections, with rulings adverse to plaintiff, his exceptions, and evidence struck out on defendants’ motion. The result of the trial has established the law of the case for plaintiff who has not appealed.

*354Plaintiff seeks to justify the insertion of this mass of immaterial matter in the record by the literal application of rule 232 of the Rules of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Derby v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boylan v. Southern Pacific Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. Moran v. Rainbow Appliance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. People v. JameisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. People v. FooteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  5. Solomon v. Jacfin Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API