Legal Opinion
In Re Chapman
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 16, 1955PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliamson, J.
This case arises on exceptions to a decree of the Public Utilities Commission. R. S., c. 40, § 66 (1944), now R. S., c. 44, § 67 (1954). The petitioner sought and obtained, insofar as we are here interested, an amendment to his common carrier certificate “to authorize service from and to Portland-South Portland to and from Raymond, South Casco and Naples. . . .” Congdon Transportation, a common carrier serving the same points, was permitted to intervene.
In its decree the Public Utilities Commission found:
“After a consideration of all the evidence we are of the opinion that a public necessity…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
- In re StanleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
- Hamilton v. Caribou Water, Light & Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
- Gilman v. Somerset Farmers Co-Operative Telephone Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
- Public Utilities Commission v. Cole's ExpressSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- In Re Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
- Application of BallardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.