In Re Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtMarden, J.
On exceptions. The petitioner, hereinafter referred to as “B & A,” presently holder of certificate J-44, for the carrying of passengers for hire from Bangor into Aroostook County seeks authority to transport “baggage, mail and express” in its passenger motor vehicles under the provisions of Section 5 of Chapter 48, R. S. B & A supports its petition by introducing evidence of what it terms as the inadequacy in the freight delivery service in Aroostook County by reason of such scheduling and operation of the common carriers of freight whereby, in substance, any merchandise offered in Bangor for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In re StanleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
- Fornarotto v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
- Public Utilities Commission v. Cole's ExpressSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
- Public Utilities Commission v. GallopSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
- Ratner v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Labbe v. Nissen Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Sevigny v. Home Builders Ass'n of Maine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Singal v. City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Rock of Ages Corp. v. Commissioner of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
- Carter v. WilkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.