Legal Opinion

Gilman v. Somerset Farmers Co-Operative Telephone Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 26, 1930PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

Upon complaint and after notice and hearing, the Public Utilities Commission ordered and required a physical connection of the lines of the Maine Telephone and Telegraph Company and those of the Somerset Farmers Co-Operative Telephone Company, in localities where both maintain exchanges, to afford public telephone service, beyond the reach of either line alone, chiefly for other than local conversations.

The Commission also required the transfer of messages from the lines of the Maine Company to those of the Somerset Company, and vice versa, “at the point of connection nearest the origin of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Michigan Central Railroad v. Michigan Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Wright-Dickinson Hotel Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1914
  5. State ex rel. Public Service Commission v. Skagit River Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. US West Communications, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960
  3. Public Utilities Commission v. Johnson Motor TransportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  4. Casco Castle Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1945
  5. In Re ChapmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API